confidence bands for kelly ratio

Which Quantitative Finance journal shows the most skin? Which book has the prettiest illustrations?
Post Reply
User avatar
Nonius
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by Nonius »

The mu^2 term makes no sense as mu gets large. In the limit of (almost) arbitrage, it would dictate betting zero. But I see where it arises in the simplistic Taylor's argument.
Chiral is Tyler Durden
User avatar
goldorak
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by goldorak »

mu/(mu^2+sigma^2) gives far better results than mu/sigma^2 in real applications. Maybe the mu^2 term helps taming slightly the Kelly ratio when IR expectation is high and it has a good influence in the overall trading result.
If you are not living on the edge you are taking up too much space.
User avatar
NeroTulip
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by NeroTulip »

Or possibly it keeps you from betting the ranch in low vol situations... Sigma can be a pretty poor measure of risk.
Inflatable trader
User avatar
pj
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by pj »

Nonius is right.

Something fishy is going on with the formula. Confused
«Да чего там описывать, планировать! Жизнь всё равно богаче». (Саня Радченко about specification writing)
User avatar
goldorak
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by goldorak »

OPTIMAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY FOR RISKY ASSETS
If you are not living on the edge you are taking up too much space.
User avatar
Nonius
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by Nonius »

Oh, but if mu increases, then higher order Taylor's terms come into play. Duh. Then the solution gets more complicated as it's a root of a higher degree polynomial.



Nero, if you believe thorp, vol and return are all that matters cuz of CLT.
Chiral is Tyler Durden
User avatar
filthy
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by filthy »

thanks for the responses. i've been busy at actual work so i've been unable

to respond.



the mu/var formulation is only an approximation and you can just extend the taylor expansion to include skew and kurtosis terms, but more interesting are the distributions

for which the expansion fails (undefined moments). i'm sort of working on this.



but i'm really just busy at my shitty day job.
"Game's the same, just got more fierce"
User avatar
dgn2
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by dgn2 »

I would really like to contribute a bit on this, but I am also busy with my day job. I will do my best to find the time.
...WARNING: I am an optimal f'er
User avatar
Corey
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by Corey »

I am interested in taking a read; can anyone share? E-mail in profile. Thanks.
"Then there was the man who drowned crossing a stream with an average depth of six inches." W. I. E. Gates
User avatar
yanko
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

confidence bands for kelly ratio

Post by yanko »

I'm also interested in having a peak, so would somebody please forward the paper?



Thanks,



yanko
Post Reply