shared market database

User avatar
ComteZero
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by ComteZero »

i feel everybody is reinventing the wheel when it comes to market parameters datawharehouse. do you know if non-commercial exists ? if not, how about setting one ?
/* Trust is good, no trust is better. */
User avatar
granchio
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by granchio »

if by "market parameters" you mean things like implied volatilities, then it's hard to do, as the meaning of the numbers depend on the pricing models you use.
Dubito ergo sum
User avatar
ComteZero
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by ComteZero »

it can be discussed, and raw data can still be available.
/* Trust is good, no trust is better. */
User avatar
iasmath
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by iasmath »

I feel like the same - reinventing the wheel... But how feasible it is to set one database? Some few relevant points:



- Tons of data! Where to store? What are the costs? I have a SQL database on a website host but do not know if size would be enough

- Who can edit? Imagine someone execute a huge delete... Perhaps we should assign responsibilities (e.g. user "xpto1" loads prices for currencies ccy1, ccy2 etc, user "xpto2" loads retail equity prices ....)

- Interday data only or intraday too?



I think the most important is trustable raw data with correct split/dividend infos and not shit like yahoo finance. Then implied vols can be calculated by different (documented) methodologies/models.
"When we pull back the curtain, we see that the wizard is just a man, but also that the man is a wizard"
User avatar
granchio
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by granchio »

Agreed raw data is what matter.
Dubito ergo sum
User avatar
Strange
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by Strange »

I think it makes a lot of sense from the perspective of sharing initial data, storage and maintenance costs. On the other hand, data and data manipulation is frequently a big part of the edge.
--That word, you keep using that word! I don't think it means what you think it means
User avatar
iasmath
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by iasmath »

Agreed on edge. And that is one of the reasons I liked the idea...

- Data manipulation does not need to be stored. Focus on raw data...

- I suppose the edge is based on publicly infos. So it is already available to all of us and, if database is large enough, it would still not be obvious to anyone that there is an edge on using a given info

- Data would be yours and not of your shop (humm this is an ugly statement! I am feeling bad)
"When we pull back the curtain, we see that the wizard is just a man, but also that the man is a wizard"
User avatar
Strange
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by Strange »

What if my shop is literally my shop? :)

Personally, i think vols/options is the last place to go for something like this. I'd start at daily data for futures (there is no free source AFAIK) and higher resolution data like 1 min bars.
--That word, you keep using that word! I don't think it means what you think it means
User avatar
ComteZero
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by ComteZero »

i guess raw data is important, but processed data can also be available if manipulations are well documented. thus every user can decide if he agrees on what has been done, or if he wants to use raw data from scratch.
/* Trust is good, no trust is better. */
User avatar
MadMax
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

shared market database

Post by MadMax »

what about raw data + "views"/scripting facilities allowing users to apply their own manipulations.
Post Reply