Interactive Brokers

Non-specific Quantitative Finance related chatter.
User avatar
RFMontraz
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

Interactive Brokers

Post by RFMontraz »

Do you mean they sued the counterparty directly ? In theory they shouldn't know who the counterparty was.



Big trades are broked OTC (even if they are crossed on the exchange later) in the inter dealer market and, depending on the market, the hedge (i.e. shares) is swapped back office to back office or in some other way directly between the counterparties (in which case you need to have some details which identify buyer and seller). It's also very common for brokers to exchange names and to know who the counterparty is (ideally Wink ) after you have done the trade.
Was it worth it?
User avatar
HLCYG
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

Interactive Brokers

Post by HLCYG »

eye51 - sorry, I meant 'amongst others' (ao), and they = IB. You are right about alloptions.
WILLARD: "Don't you think it's a little risky for R&R ?" KILGORE: "If I say it's safe to surf this beach, captain - it's safe to surf this beach. I'm not afraid to surf this place, I'm not afraid to surf this fucking place."
intradaybill
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

Interactive Brokers

Post by intradaybill »

eye51,



Part of the story can be found in this link if you scroll down under "Market manipulation claim":



http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070709/REG/70706053/1030/TOC



Actually, it was $37 Million they lost in options In a German stock. Very speculative. I hate it when they win they were right when they lose they accuse of market manipulation.



Bill
User avatar
eye51
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:00 am

Interactive Brokers

Post by eye51 »

Thanks for the link.
Peace means reloading your guns
Post Reply